 |
Censored Gold Ads. Not even FNC or FBN would run ads from Swiss America Trading Corp that cast Wealth Redistributor in Chief Barack Hussein Obama and Quantitative Easer in Chief Ben Bernanke in a negative light: ...
Not even FNC or FBN would run ads from Swiss America Trading Corp that cast Wealth Redistributor in Chief Barack Hussein Obama and Quantitative Easer in Chief Ben Bernanke in a negative light:
February 15, 2012 at 5:14 pm Ad was censored?? So, what Americans are not smart enough to decide for themselves. Get ready America ? it?s coming. Jim says:
February 15, 2012 at 5:38 pm I guess my decision to not have cable or satellite TV and to minimumize my TV viewing in general was a good one, cause I don?t trust the MSM. johnnosk says:
February 15, 2012 at 5:52 pm Americans seem to forget that in their personal crusades for their ?rights?, they forget that private companies can choose not to accept your ads or the fees that you would have paid.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Ghost of FA Hayek says:
In fact, I think I will take the amount I did NOT send this month to those clowns, and buy some more GOLD Agnostic Conservative says:
That is why year after year after year you end up with Republican nominations like Bob Dole, George Bush, John McCain, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich.
Fox, PBS, NBC and co. have ensured that the American electorate have their heads up their ass. And to be frank, they do a terrific job. Sam Adams says:
February 16, 2012 at 12:05 am I?m with johnnosk. Private companies can choose to take an advertiser?s money or not. However, the fact that Fox chose not to air these ads indicates that Fox is part of the MSM, and isn?t really the conservative (or libertarian) voice.
February 16, 2012 at 9:35 am Wow Agnostic. I did not think there was a historical formula for what I think I always knew in the back of my head. Very interesting. But it begs the question, where in this world do we find the sound premises that will lead us to sound conclusions? Dupree says:
February 16, 2012 at 10:35 am Hegelian dialectic also seems to explain Lao?s position on just about anything. Agnostic Conservative says:
But this is for certain ? as long as the thesis and the anti-thesis are controlled (based on the same set of premises) the synthesis will also be controlled (based on the same set of premises) with minor variations in conclusions.
They KEY to breaking the matrix is to question the premises of those providing the thesis and anti-thesis narratives and finding solid, rational premises for your arguments and synthesis.